Форма представления | Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
Год публикации | 2016 |
Язык | английский |
|
Гильфанова Гульнара Тавкильевна, автор
Салимзанова Диляра Айратовна, автор
|
Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала |
Gilfanova G. , Salimzanova D. Evaluativity of Fixed Collocations Describing Wedding Traditions in the English and Russian Languages / G. Gilfanova, D. Salimzanova // International Journal of Humanities and
Cultural Studies. - 2016. - P.287-292
|
Аннотация |
International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies |
Ключевые слова |
evaluativity, phraseological units, pejorative, meliorative evaluation, national and cultural originality. |
Название журнала |
International Journal of Humanities Education
|
URL |
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index |
Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=135038 |
Полная запись метаданных |
Поле DC |
Значение |
Язык |
dc.contributor.author |
Гильфанова Гульнара Тавкильевна |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Салимзанова Диляра Айратовна |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Gilfanova G. , Salimzanova D. Evaluativity of Fixed Collocations Describing Wedding Traditions in the English and Russian Languages / G. Gilfanova, D. Salimzanova // International Journal of Humanities and
Cultural Studies. - 2016. - P.287-292
|
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=135038 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
International Journal of Humanities Education |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
Phraseologists have always emphasized the role of connotation in the structure of meaning of phraseological units as an aspect of linguistic semantic category. Connotation is used for figurative, expressive and emotional characteristics and intensified subjective evaluation of the
phenomena of the reality. It is worth noting that the examples described above visually demonstrate close link of the components of connotation, first and foremost, evaluative and emotive, where similar elements of the analysis in studying phraseological layer are definitely present. The authors emphasize the manifestation of the evaluative component of the studied phraseological units in the English and Tatar languages as a specific feature where one observes the prevalence of
phraseological units with rational positive or neutral attitudinal meaning as distinct from vast majority of other phraseological units that have pejorative evaluativity. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
evaluativity |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
phraseological units |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
pejorative |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
meliorative evaluation |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
national and cultural originality. |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
Evaluativity of Fixed Collocations Describing Wedding Traditions in the
English and Russian Languages
|
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
ru_RU |
|