Форма представления | Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
Год публикации | 2017 |
Язык | английский |
|
Арсланов Камиль Маратович, автор
Хабиров Артур Ильфарович, автор
|
Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала |
Arslanov K.M., Khabirov A.I. About the bilateral character of the debt contract / K.M. Arslanov, A.I. Khabirov // National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald. - 2017. - № 4. - P. 99-103. |
Аннотация |
In work the question about bilateral (the bilateral responsibility) character of the loan agreement is investigated. A conclusion about existence in the loan agreement of the rights not only for the lessor (traditional approach), but also for the borrower is proved. In educational and scientific literature in connection with the subjective rights and obligations of the loan agreement parties the opinion prevails that the obligation under the contract of a monetary loan is unilaterally binding as the authorized party - the creditor – who is always the lessor, and the borrower [4 will always be bound party - the debtor-; 390]. At the same time it is necessary to differentiate the contract monetary and the contract of a commodity (real) loan in connection with differences in a set of the bilateral rights and duties of the lessor and borrower. |
Ключевые слова |
loan agreement, bilaterally binding character, rights of the borrower |
Название журнала |
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MANAGERIAL STAFF OF CULTURE AND ARTS HERALD
|
Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=173020 |
Файлы ресурса | |
|
Полная запись метаданных |
Поле DC |
Значение |
Язык |
dc.contributor.author |
Арсланов Камиль Маратович |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Хабиров Артур Ильфарович |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Arslanov K.M., Khabirov A.I. About the bilateral character of the debt contract / K.M. Arslanov, A.I. Khabirov // National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald. - 2017. - № 4. - P. 99-103. |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=173020 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MANAGERIAL STAFF OF CULTURE AND ARTS HERALD |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
In work the question about bilateral (the bilateral responsibility) character of the loan agreement is investigated. A conclusion about existence in the loan agreement of the rights not only for the lessor (traditional approach), but also for the borrower is proved. In educational and scientific literature in connection with the subjective rights and obligations of the loan agreement parties the opinion prevails that the obligation under the contract of a monetary loan is unilaterally binding as the authorized party - the creditor – who is always the lessor, and the borrower [4 will always be bound party - the debtor-; 390]. At the same time it is necessary to differentiate the contract monetary and the contract of a commodity (real) loan in connection with differences in a set of the bilateral rights and duties of the lessor and borrower. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
loan agreement |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
bilaterally binding character |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
rights of the borrower |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
About the bilateral character of the debt contrac |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
ru_RU |
|