Форма представления | Статьи в российских журналах и сборниках |
Год публикации | 2016 |
Язык | русский |
|
Жолобов Олег Феофанович, автор
|
Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала |
Жолобов О.Ф. Заметки о словоформе е 'есть' в древнерусский и старославянской письменности // Slověne. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 114–125.
Oleg F. Zholobov. Notes on the Word Form Je 'Is' in Old Russian and Old Church Slavonic Literature // Slověne. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 114–125.
|
Аннотация |
A study of the so-called zero-forms of the present tense 3rd person singular and plural (without
inflectional -tь) in the birch bark manuscripts has once again attracted the attention of researchers to
this grammatical phenomenon. Andrey Zaliznyak established the zero-forms usage positions and their
range and functions, and he arrived at the conclusion that they are Novgorod dialectisms. Analysis of
the Old Slavonic and written sources of the Russian Southwest found similarities with the Novgorod
birch bark manuscripts, so the zero-forms should be considered Proto-Slavic dialectisms, inherited by
different Old Russian dialects and tracing back to the injunctive and the conjunctive, its further
substitute. At the same time, data correlation showed the narrowness of the birch bark manuscripts'
discursive range. A. Zaliznyak discovered several jе 'is' word forms in a supposedly enclitic function.
He noted, however, that there was a lack of material for drawing final conclusions. |
Ключевые слова |
zero-forms present tense, injunctive, verbal enclitics, jе word form, non-factive meaning, non-actual
present tense, gnomic present tense, generalization |
Название журнала |
Slověne
|
URL |
http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/issue/view/10/showToc |
Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=138827 |
Полная запись метаданных |
Поле DC |
Значение |
Язык |
dc.contributor.author |
Жолобов Олег Феофанович |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Жолобов О.Ф. Заметки о словоформе е 'есть' в древнерусский и старославянской письменности // Slověne. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 114–125.
Oleg F. Zholobov. Notes on the Word Form Je 'Is' in Old Russian and Old Church Slavonic Literature // Slověne. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 114–125.
|
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=138827 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
Slověne |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
A study of the so-called zero-forms of the present tense 3rd person singular and plural (without
inflectional -tь) in the birch bark manuscripts has once again attracted the attention of researchers to
this grammatical phenomenon. Andrey Zaliznyak established the zero-forms usage positions and their
range and functions, and he arrived at the conclusion that they are Novgorod dialectisms. Analysis of
the Old Slavonic and written sources of the Russian Southwest found similarities with the Novgorod
birch bark manuscripts, so the zero-forms should be considered Proto-Slavic dialectisms, inherited by
different Old Russian dialects and tracing back to the injunctive and the conjunctive, its further
substitute. At the same time, data correlation showed the narrowness of the birch bark manuscripts'
discursive range. A. Zaliznyak discovered several jе 'is' word forms in a supposedly enclitic function.
He noted, however, that there was a lack of material for drawing final conclusions. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
zero-forms present tense |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
injunctive |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
verbal enclitics |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
jе word form |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
non-factive meaning |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
non-actual
present tense |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
gnomic present tense |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
generalization |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
Заметки о словоформе е 'есть' в древнерусский и старославянской письменности |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Статьи в российских журналах и сборниках |
ru_RU |
|