КФУ. Карточка публикации. Measuring sustainable cities in Russia: critical analysis of key methodologies

КАЗАНСКИЙ
ФЕДЕРАЛЬНЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

RUS

- EN
- 中文
- ES

MEASURING SUSTAINABLE CITIES IN RUSSIA: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF KEY METHODOLOGIES

Форма представления

Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках

Год публикации

2018

Язык

английский

Авторы, сотрудники КФУ

Егорова Лилия Георгиевна, автор

Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала

Ermolaeva P.O., Basheva O.A., Ermolaeva Y.V.,, Egorova, L.G. Measuring sustainable cities in Russia: critical analysis of key methodologies//AMAZONIA INVESTIGA. - 2018. - Vol.7, Is.14. - P.381-386.

Аннотация

The paper provides insights on the critical analysis of the current methodologies of the sustainability cities measurement for the present-day Russia. Based on meta-analysis of more than 90 peer-reviewed papers published in Russian and English, we examined both authoring and corporate methodologies such as the SGM methodology for Russian sustainable cities, the environmental rating of Russian cities, and the rating of the environmental governance of the Russian cities, the environmental efficacy index and several authoring methodologies. The analysis showed that most of the calculation methods are based on quantitative (statistical) data, what is their advantage, on the one hand, making their results as objective as possible, but on the other hand, it is a disadvantage, because in connection with the delay in publication of statistics or even its absence, it does not allow the annual dynamics to observe. In addition, the difficulty in choosing the most suitable methodology lies in the significant differences in the development of large, medium and small cities in Russia, and many rating methods are developed exclusively for one of the types of cities. Authors concluded that in spite of the high level of the existing methodologies development, there was a shortage of comprehensive studies carried out in the qualitative-quantitative paradigm that would, in addition to index assessment and mathematical models generation, explain complex causal relationships and processes within a city.

Ключевые слова

sustainable cities, measurements, sustainable city methodologies, sustainable city indicators, Russia, Global South, Global North, metabolism

Название журнала

AMAZONIA INVESTIGA

Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку

https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=193311

Полная запись метаданных

Поле DC	Значение	Язык
dc.contributor.author	Егорова Лилия Георгиевна	ru_RU
dc.date.accessioned	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.available	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.issued	2018	ru_RU
dc.identifier.citation	Ermolaeva P.O., Basheva O.A., Ermolaeva Y.V.,, Egorova, L.G. Measuring sustainable cities in Russia: critical analysis of key methodologies//AMAZONIA INVESTIGA. - 2018. - Vol.7, Is.14. - P.381-386.	ru_RU
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=193311	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	AMAZONIA INVESTIGA	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	The paper provides insights on the critical analysis of the current methodologies of the sustainability cities measurement for the present-day Russia. Based on meta-analysis of more than 90 peer-reviewed papers published in Russian and English, we examined both authoring and corporate methodologies such as the SGM methodology for Russian sustainable cities, the environmental rating of Russian cities, and the rating of the environmental governance of the Russian cities, the environmental efficacy index and several authoring methodologies. The analysis showed that most of the calculation methods are based on quantitative (statistical) data, what is their advantage, on the one hand, making their results as objective as possible, but on the other hand, it is a disadvantage, because in connection with the delay in publication of statistics or even its absence, it does not allow the annual dynamics to observe. In addition, the difficulty in choosing the most suitable methodology lies in the significant differences in the development of large, medium and small cities in Russia, and many rating methods are developed exclusively for one of the types of cities. Authors concluded that in spite of the high level of the existing methodologies development, there was a shortage of comprehensive studies carried out in the qualitative-quantitative paradigm that would, in addition to index assessment and mathematical models generation, explain complex causal relationships and processes within a city.	ru_RU
dc.language.iso	ru	ru_RU
dc.subject	sustainable cities	ru_RU
dc.subject	measurements	ru_RU
dc.subject	sustainable city methodologies	ru_RU
dc.subject	sustainable city indicators	ru_RU
dc.subject	Russia	ru_RU
dc.subject	Global South	ru_RU
dc.subject	Global North	ru_RU
dc.subject	metabolism	ru_RU
dc.title	Measuring sustainable cities in Russia: critical analysis of key methodologies	ru_RU
dc.type	Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках	ru_RU