| Форма представления | Статьи в российских журналах и сборниках |
| Год публикации | 2019 |
| Язык | английский |
|
Еманова Юлиана Геннадьевна, автор
Мухаметзянова Лилия Ринатовна, автор
Яо Михаил Константинович, автор
|
|
Pushkar Taisiya , автор
|
| Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала |
Muhametzanova L., Pushkar T.,Emanova J. , Yao M. THE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY ART DEMANDS AND ACADEMIC TRADITIONS OF ART EDUCATION//Herald NAMSCA. - 2018.- №3(2). Р. 5-7. |
| Аннотация |
To date, one can observe a discrepancy between the academic traditions of the training of artists and
the nature of development of contemporary art. The paradox consists in the fact that the main centers of art education,
inculcating professional skills, do not create the conditions for the formation of a creative personality, who would be
able to present fundamentally new concepts in art. In order to determine whether there is a link between the system of
art education and the degree of recognition of the artist by the expert community, a content analysis of the foreign
reference books on art has been conducted. The problem of assessing their significance as cultural values is reflected in
the principles of the selection of authors and their works. Content analysis reveals that the most frequently mentioned
are the works by ancient Russian masters, Theophanes Grek, Andrei Rublev; masters of realism I. Repin, V. Serov; the
names of modernist artists – V. Kandinsky, K. Malevich, V. Tatlin, M. Larionov, N. Goncharova, E. Lisitsky, A.
Rodchenko; artists who developed their personal style in Russia, and biography in other countries - A. Yavlensky, M.
Verevkina, Ch. Soutine, M. Chagall, N. Gabo, A. Pevsner, A. Arkhipenko. After acquainting with their biographies, the
authors found out that only two of them were constructivists — V. Tatlin and E. Lissitzky had an art school completed,
but not an academic one. Moreover, all the most famous modernists were expelled or dropped out of art schools. From
their own memories, they were formed and supported by the artistic environment of modernism. The problem consists
in the imbalance between those who are being in demand in the visual arts of today and those who are being trained by
the modern Russian system of art education. A number of divergences characterize the system of relations between
contemporary art and the traditional system of art education – between the expectations of the students and the system
of education, teachers' understanding of their tasks and the requirements of the expert community, criteria of estimation
of a student and an artist. According to the authors, the function of school is not to answer the questions but to teach the
future artist to put them both to himself and his audience |
| Ключевые слова |
contemporary art, art education, academic traditions, creative method, modernism, reference books
on art, artistic individuality. |
| Название журнала |
Herald NAMSCA
|
| URL |
http://jrhnamsca.icu/index.php/hnamsca/article/view/129/129 |
| Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=203829 |
Полная запись метаданных  |
| Поле DC |
Значение |
Язык |
| dc.contributor.author |
Еманова Юлиана Геннадьевна |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Мухаметзянова Лилия Ринатовна |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Яо Михаил Константинович |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Pushkar Taisiya |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.available |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.issued |
2019 |
ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.citation |
Muhametzanova L., Pushkar T.,Emanova J. , Yao M. THE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY ART DEMANDS AND ACADEMIC TRADITIONS OF ART EDUCATION//Herald NAMSCA. - 2018.- №3(2). Р. 5-7. |
ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=203829 |
ru_RU |
| dc.description.abstract |
Herald NAMSCA |
ru_RU |
| dc.description.abstract |
To date, one can observe a discrepancy between the academic traditions of the training of artists and
the nature of development of contemporary art. The paradox consists in the fact that the main centers of art education,
inculcating professional skills, do not create the conditions for the formation of a creative personality, who would be
able to present fundamentally new concepts in art. In order to determine whether there is a link between the system of
art education and the degree of recognition of the artist by the expert community, a content analysis of the foreign
reference books on art has been conducted. The problem of assessing their significance as cultural values is reflected in
the principles of the selection of authors and their works. Content analysis reveals that the most frequently mentioned
are the works by ancient Russian masters, Theophanes Grek, Andrei Rublev; masters of realism I. Repin, V. Serov; the
names of modernist artists – V. Kandinsky, K. Malevich, V. Tatlin, M. Larionov, N. Goncharova, E. Lisitsky, A.
Rodchenko; artists who developed their personal style in Russia, and biography in other countries - A. Yavlensky, M.
Verevkina, Ch. Soutine, M. Chagall, N. Gabo, A. Pevsner, A. Arkhipenko. After acquainting with their biographies, the
authors found out that only two of them were constructivists — V. Tatlin and E. Lissitzky had an art school completed,
but not an academic one. Moreover, all the most famous modernists were expelled or dropped out of art schools. From
their own memories, they were formed and supported by the artistic environment of modernism. The problem consists
in the imbalance between those who are being in demand in the visual arts of today and those who are being trained by
the modern Russian system of art education. A number of divergences characterize the system of relations between
contemporary art and the traditional system of art education – between the expectations of the students and the system
of education, teachers' understanding of their tasks and the requirements of the expert community, criteria of estimation
of a student and an artist. According to the authors, the function of school is not to answer the questions but to teach the
future artist to put them both to himself and his audience |
ru_RU |
| dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
contemporary art |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
art education |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
academic traditions |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
creative method |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
modernism |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
reference books
on art |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
artistic individuality. |
ru_RU |
| dc.title |
THE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY ART DEMANDS AND ACADEMIC TRADITIONS OF ART EDUCATION |
ru_RU |
| dc.type |
Статьи в российских журналах и сборниках |
ru_RU |
|
EN 
中文 
ES 
Карта сайта
