| Форма представления | Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
| Год публикации | 2022 |
| Язык | английский |
|
Масалимова Альфия Рафисовна, автор
|
| Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала |
Sudakova, N.E.; Savina, T.N.; Masalimova, A.R.; Mikhaylovsky, M.N.; Karandeeva, L.G.; Zhdanov, S.P. Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis. Education Sciences. 2022, 12, 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030209 |
| Аннотация |
Assessment is critical in postsecondary education, as it is at all levels. Assessments are classified into four types: diagnostic, summative, evaluative, and formative. Recent trends in assessment have migrated away from summative to formative evaluations. Formative evaluations help students develop expertise and concentrate their schedules, ease student anxiety, instill a feeling of ownership in students as they go, and confirm the module's subject notion. Online formative assessment (OFA) emerged as a result of the convergence of formative and computer-assisted assessment research. Bibliometric analyses provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of a study topic across a particular time period. We used a PRISMA-compliant bibliometric method. The Scopus database was searched for BibTex-formatted publication data. In total, 898 studies were analyzed. According to the results, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and Computers & Education are the most influential sources |
| Ключевые слова |
online formative assessment; higher education; bibliometrics analysis |
| Название журнала |
Education Sciences
|
| URL |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/3/209 |
| Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=269280 |
| Файлы ресурса | |
|
|
Полная запись метаданных  |
| Поле DC |
Значение |
Язык |
| dc.contributor.author |
Масалимова Альфия Рафисовна |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.available |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.issued |
2022 |
ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.citation |
Sudakova, N.E.; Savina, T.N.; Masalimova, A.R.; Mikhaylovsky, M.N.; Karandeeva, L.G.; Zhdanov, S.P. Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis. Education Sciences. 2022, 12, 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030209 |
ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=269280 |
ru_RU |
| dc.description.abstract |
Education Sciences |
ru_RU |
| dc.description.abstract |
Assessment is critical in postsecondary education, as it is at all levels. Assessments are classified into four types: diagnostic, summative, evaluative, and formative. Recent trends in assessment have migrated away from summative to formative evaluations. Formative evaluations help students develop expertise and concentrate their schedules, ease student anxiety, instill a feeling of ownership in students as they go, and confirm the module's subject notion. Online formative assessment (OFA) emerged as a result of the convergence of formative and computer-assisted assessment research. Bibliometric analyses provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of a study topic across a particular time period. We used a PRISMA-compliant bibliometric method. The Scopus database was searched for BibTex-formatted publication data. In total, 898 studies were analyzed. According to the results, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and Computers & Education are the most influential sources |
ru_RU |
| dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
|
ru_RU |
| dc.title |
Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis |
ru_RU |
| dc.type |
Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
ru_RU |
|
EN 
中文 
ES 
Карта сайта
