| Форма представления | Тезисы и материалы конференций в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
| Год публикации | 2022 |
| Язык | русский |
|
Варфоломеев Михаил Алексеевич, автор
Деревянко Вадим Константинович, автор
Минханов Ильгиз Фаильевич, автор
Рохас Родригес Аллан Андрес , автор
Сафина Регина Эдуардовна, автор
Судаков Владислав Анатольевич, автор
Тазеев Айдар Ринатович, автор
Усманов Сергей Анатольевич, автор
|
| Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала |
Safina R. E. Impact of Methane Injection on SAGD Performance. Analysis of Laboratory Survey and Field Scale Simulation Results / Regina E. Safina, Sergey A. Usmanov, Allan A. Rojas, Ilgiz F. Minkhanov, Vadim K. Derevyanko, Aidar R. Tazeev, Mikhail A. Varfolomeev, Vladislav A. Sudakov, Marat I.Amerkhanov, Fanil M. Akhmetzyanov // BOOK OF ABSTRACTS
V International Workshop «Thermal Methods for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Laboratory Testing, Simulation and Oilfields applications»
ThEOR2022 p.9
|
| Аннотация |
«Thermal Methods for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Laboratory Testing, Simulation and Oilfields Applications» ThEOR2022 |
| Ключевые слова |
SAGD; super-viscous oil; numerical simulation; non-condensable gas |
| Название журнала |
«Thermal Methods for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Laboratory Testing, Simulation and Oilfields Applications» ThEOR2022
|
| Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=275421 |
| Файлы ресурса | |
|
|
Полная запись метаданных  |
| Поле DC |
Значение |
Язык |
| dc.contributor.author |
Варфоломеев Михаил Алексеевич |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Деревянко Вадим Константинович |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Минханов Ильгиз Фаильевич |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Рохас Родригес Аллан Андрес |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Сафина Регина Эдуардовна |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Судаков Владислав Анатольевич |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Тазеев Айдар Ринатович |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Усманов Сергей Анатольевич |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.available |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.issued |
2022 |
ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.citation |
Safina R. E. Impact of Methane Injection on SAGD Performance. Analysis of Laboratory Survey and Field Scale Simulation Results / Regina E. Safina, Sergey A. Usmanov, Allan A. Rojas, Ilgiz F. Minkhanov, Vadim K. Derevyanko, Aidar R. Tazeev, Mikhail A. Varfolomeev, Vladislav A. Sudakov, Marat I.Amerkhanov, Fanil M. Akhmetzyanov // BOOK OF ABSTRACTS
V International Workshop «Thermal Methods for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Laboratory Testing, Simulation and Oilfields applications»
ThEOR2022 p.9
|
ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=275421 |
ru_RU |
| dc.description.abstract |
«Thermal Methods for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Laboratory Testing, Simulation and Oilfields Applications» ThEOR2022 |
ru_RU |
| dc.description.abstract |
SAGD is a successful thermal recovery technique, applied in Permian super-viscous oil
deposits in the Republic of Tatarstan. Despite its proven efficiency, SAGD remains an energy
consuming technique and thus results in considerable GHG emissions. In one of the SAGD
modifications a non-condensable gas is added to the injected steam to maintain pressure in the steam
chamber. Methane is used as the main soluble non-condensable gas in oil reservoirs. Being lighter than
steam, methane tends to accumulate in the upper part of steam chamber and reduce heat losses to the
overburden rock. In addition, the ascending gas produces the gravity effect on oil, dragging it down
towards the producer well.
However, heat losses on the edges of the steam chamber (due to excess non-condensable gas)
and risk of chamber collapse (due to reduced steam partial pressure) require careful estimation of the
amounts of planned injected gas in accordance with the current size of the steam chamber. The
numerical model was used to investigate the impact of different volumes of injected methane on
SAGD process.
Physical-chemical effects of the process including the methane diffusion and probability of
asphaltenes precipitation should be considered in numerical models and require laboratory studies for a
specific oil including oil displacement experiments by methane and steam. For that reason, steam and
methane co-injection were conducted, analyzed and reproduced on one-dimensional physical model.
Field scale numerical simulation results show the evidence that the modification of SAGD
technology could become ineffective with continuous steam and methane co-injection or with cycling
co-injection of steam and steam/methane with a ratio less than 2/1. Considering the technique
limitations, numerical simulation allows to choose the best scenario (in terms of optimal volume and
best well candidates) where methane, as an EOR agent in steam co-injection, shows better effectivity
than as a fuel for water to steam conversion |
ru_RU |
| dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
|
ru_RU |
| dc.title |
Impact of Methane Injection on SAGD Performance. Analysis of Laboratory Survey and Field Scale Simulation Results |
ru_RU |
| dc.type |
Тезисы и материалы конференций в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
ru_RU |
|
EN 
中文 
ES 
Карта сайта
