| Форма представления | Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
| Год публикации | 2023 |
| Язык | английский |
|
Каюмова Гелюся Фаридовна, автор
|
| Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала |
Sukhareva IV, Kayumova GF, Gazieva AA, Historical and Bibliographic Study of the Development of Archeology in the Russian Empire//BYLYE GODY. - 2023. - Vol.18, Is.3. - P.1570-1580. |
| Аннотация |
The attention to the experience of predecessors in science is dictated by the need to assess the level of
development of today's knowledge. This experience is often undeservedly forgotten. That leads to mistakes
and misunderstandings. Archaeology is no exception. It is closely connected with modernity, as it allows us
to trace the origins of many current ideas, ideas, traits of the national mentality. The policy of the Russian
state in the field of archeology development can be enriched by the experience of the state policy of the
Russian Empire, an experience that turns out to be instructive and in many ways applicable now. This is due to
the relevance of this work. The study of historiography is constructed in accordance with the division into three
conditional blocks. The first historiographical block includes works devoted to the development of archeology in
Russia as a science and state policy in this direction. To the second – works on the historiography of archeology
of individual periods and regions, to the third – the personalities of the pioneers of the national archaeological
science. Since the historiographical part accompanies any archaeological work, the article draws attention to the
works of recent years, the distinctive feature of which is the appeal to archival materials, the introduction of
new sources into circulation. It is such works that the main attention is paid in this article. The use of
archaeologists' archives allows modern researchers to reveal new facets of scientific and pedagogical creativity
of the pioneers of Russian archaeology and dispel the established scientific myths associated with their
activities. As a result of the research, new directions in historiography are highlighted and a conclusion is made
about the need to form a new type of scientist – archaeologist-historiographer who has information on various
aspects of the humanities, which corresponds to the interdisciplinary nature of modern knowledge. |
| Ключевые слова |
historiography of archeology, history of archeology, Russian Empire, I.E. Zabelin,
A.S. Uvarov, A.A. Formozov, L.S. Klein. |
| Название журнала |
Bylye Gody
|
| Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=295881 |
Полная запись метаданных  |
| Поле DC |
Значение |
Язык |
| dc.contributor.author |
Каюмова Гелюся Фаридовна |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.available |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.issued |
2023 |
ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.citation |
Sukhareva IV, Kayumova GF, Gazieva AA, Historical and Bibliographic Study of the Development of Archeology in the Russian Empire//BYLYE GODY. - 2023. - Vol.18, Is.3. - P.1570-1580. |
ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=295881 |
ru_RU |
| dc.description.abstract |
Bylye Gody |
ru_RU |
| dc.description.abstract |
The attention to the experience of predecessors in science is dictated by the need to assess the level of
development of today's knowledge. This experience is often undeservedly forgotten. That leads to mistakes
and misunderstandings. Archaeology is no exception. It is closely connected with modernity, as it allows us
to trace the origins of many current ideas, ideas, traits of the national mentality. The policy of the Russian
state in the field of archeology development can be enriched by the experience of the state policy of the
Russian Empire, an experience that turns out to be instructive and in many ways applicable now. This is due to
the relevance of this work. The study of historiography is constructed in accordance with the division into three
conditional blocks. The first historiographical block includes works devoted to the development of archeology in
Russia as a science and state policy in this direction. To the second – works on the historiography of archeology
of individual periods and regions, to the third – the personalities of the pioneers of the national archaeological
science. Since the historiographical part accompanies any archaeological work, the article draws attention to the
works of recent years, the distinctive feature of which is the appeal to archival materials, the introduction of
new sources into circulation. It is such works that the main attention is paid in this article. The use of
archaeologists' archives allows modern researchers to reveal new facets of scientific and pedagogical creativity
of the pioneers of Russian archaeology and dispel the established scientific myths associated with their
activities. As a result of the research, new directions in historiography are highlighted and a conclusion is made
about the need to form a new type of scientist – archaeologist-historiographer who has information on various
aspects of the humanities, which corresponds to the interdisciplinary nature of modern knowledge. |
ru_RU |
| dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
historiography of archeology |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
history of archeology |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
Russian Empire |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
I.E. Zabelin |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
A.S. Uvarov |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
A.A. Formozov |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
L.S. Klein. |
ru_RU |
| dc.title |
Historical and Bibliographic Study of the Development of Archeology in the Russian Empire |
ru_RU |
| dc.type |
Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
ru_RU |
|
EN 
中文 
ES 
Карта сайта
