КФУ. Карточка публикации. Deproblematization of interethnic and interconfessional relations and memory policy in the republic of Tatarstan

КАЗАНСКИЙ
ФЕДЕРАЛЬНЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

RUS

- EN
- 中文
- ES

DEPROBLEMATIZATION OF INTERETHNIC AND INTERCONFESSIONAL RELATIONS AND MEMORY POLICY IN THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN

Форма представления

Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках

Год публикации

2025

Язык

английский

Авторы, сотрудники КФУ

Гарина Карина Адгамовна, автор

Ефлова Мария Юрьевна, автор

Максимова Ольга Александровна, автор

Маяковская Анастасия Владимировна, автор

Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала

Eflova M, Garina K, Maximova O, Deproblematization of interethnic and interconfessional relations and memory policy in the republic of Tatarstan//INTERACCION Y PERSPECTIVA. - 2025. - Vol.15, Is.1. - .

Аннотация

A key factor of consolidation and harmony in any society is a responsible and respectful attitude to its past. The study of the relationship between memory politics and the identities of ethnic groups, for whom the origin and sense of a shared past consolidates solidarity in the present, determines the perceptions of their identity and relations with other groups, is particularly significant. The article presents the results of the study of the Politics of Memory in the Republic of Tatarstan and considers the processes of turning to the Bulgarian period as a source that can be referred to in order to explain the foundations and current trends of events in politics, religion, art and even to analyze a number of ethical issues (such as patriotism, tolerance, etc.). Representations of the Bulgarian period help to build an image of a self-evident «natural peace« between representatives of different ethnic groups and confessions in the region. The strategy works primarily through such channels as the media, statements by officials, and education. The positive effect of such a memory policy is to establish tolerance as a norm that is used for socialization within the framework of the institution of education, while the negative effect is related to the fact that the problems of interaction between multiple ethnic groups and confessions can be attributed to chance, and lead to the eventual ignoring of systemic problems.

Ключевые слова

ethnicity, confession, politics of memory, social memory, tourism, places of memory.

Название журнала

INTERACCION Y PERSPECTIVA

URL

https://zenodo.org/records/14031749

Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку

https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=307718

Полная запись метаданных

Поле DC	Значение	Язык
dc.contributor.author	Гарина Карина Адгамовна	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Ефлова Мария Юрьевна	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Максимова Ольга Александровна	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Маяковская Анастасия Владимировна	ru_RU
dc.date.accessioned	2025-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.available	2025-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.issued	2025	ru_RU
dc.identifier.citation	Eflova M, Garina K, Maximova O, Deproblematization of interethnic and interconfessional relations and memory policy in the republic of Tatarstan//INTERACCION Y PERSPECTIVA. - 2025. - Vol.15, Is.1. - .	ru_RU
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=307718	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	INTERACCION Y PERSPECTIVA	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	A key factor of consolidation and harmony in any society is a responsible and respectful attitude to its past. The study of the relationship between memory politics and the identities of ethnic groups, for whom the origin and sense of a shared past consolidates solidarity in the present, determines the perceptions of their identity and relations with other groups, is particularly significant. The article presents the results of the study of the Politics of Memory in the Republic of Tatarstan and considers the processes of turning to the Bulgarian period as a source that can be referred to in order to explain the foundations and current trends of events in politics, religion, art and even to analyze a number of ethical issues (such as patriotism, tolerance, etc.). Representations of the Bulgarian period help to build an image of a self-evident «natural peace« between representatives of different ethnic groups and confessions in the region. The strategy works primarily through such channels as the media, statements by officials, and education. The positive effect of such a memory policy is to establish tolerance as a norm that is used for socialization within the framework of the institution of education, while the negative effect is related to the fact that the problems of interaction between multiple ethnic groups and confessions can be attributed to chance, and lead to the eventual ignoring of systemic problems.	ru_RU
dc.language.iso	ru	ru_RU
dc.subject	ethnicity	ru_RU
dc.subject	confession	ru_RU
dc.subject	politics of memory	ru_RU
dc.subject	social memory	ru_RU
dc.subject	tourism	ru_RU
dc.subject	places of memory.	ru_RU
dc.title	Deproblematization of interethnic and interconfessional relations and memory policy in the republic of Tatarstan	ru_RU
dc.type	Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках	ru_RU