| Форма представления | Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
| Год публикации | 2013 |
|
Нигоматуллина Резида Масхутовна, автор
Николаева Евгения Михайловна, автор
|
| Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала |
Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 15 (7): 966-972, 2013
The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of management as a specific field of activity.
It is shown that the crisis of modernity as a universal project has showed signs of failure of the classical
paradigm of management, which is based on linear rationality and rigid subject-object dichotomy. Modern
science has shaped the contours of a new paradigm of management based on theoretical and methodological
arsenal of self-organization theory (synergetics). Pathos of new management style is how to awaken motion
and to give impetus to evolution by small resonance effects and relevant internal organization of the system.
In this context, there is a failure of coercive control model based on a strict hierarchy of subject-object
relationship in favor of a model where subject and object of management are bound with the relationship of
assistance.
|
| Аннотация |
The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of management as a specific field of activity.
It is shown that the crisis of modernity as a universal project has showed signs of failure of the classical
paradigm of management, which is based on linear rationality and rigid subject-object dichotomy. Modern
science has shaped the contours of a new paradigm of management based on theoretical and methodological
arsenal of self-organization theory (synergetics). Pathos of new management style is how to awaken motion
and to give impetus to evolution by small resonance effects and relevant internal organization of the system.
In this context, there is a failure of coercive control model based on a strict hierarchy of subject-object
relationship in favor of a model where subject and object of management are bound with the relationship of
assistance.
|
| Ключевые слова |
Modern Management, Crisis of modernity, Freedom of subjectivity, Instrumental rationality,
Post-nonclassical management model, Self-organization, Structure-attractors. |
| URL |
http://www.idosi.org/mejsr/mejsr15(7)13.htm |
| Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=72679 |
Полная запись метаданных  |
| Поле DC |
Значение |
Язык |
| dc.contributor.author |
Нигоматуллина Резида Масхутовна |
ru_RU |
| dc.contributor.author |
Николаева Евгения Михайловна |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.available |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
| dc.date.issued |
2013 |
ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.citation |
Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 15 (7): 966-972, 2013
The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of management as a specific field of activity.
It is shown that the crisis of modernity as a universal project has showed signs of failure of the classical
paradigm of management, which is based on linear rationality and rigid subject-object dichotomy. Modern
science has shaped the contours of a new paradigm of management based on theoretical and methodological
arsenal of self-organization theory (synergetics). Pathos of new management style is how to awaken motion
and to give impetus to evolution by small resonance effects and relevant internal organization of the system.
In this context, there is a failure of coercive control model based on a strict hierarchy of subject-object
relationship in favor of a model where subject and object of management are bound with the relationship of
assistance.
|
ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=72679 |
ru_RU |
| dc.description.abstract |
The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of management as a specific field of activity.
It is shown that the crisis of modernity as a universal project has showed signs of failure of the classical
paradigm of management, which is based on linear rationality and rigid subject-object dichotomy. Modern
science has shaped the contours of a new paradigm of management based on theoretical and methodological
arsenal of self-organization theory (synergetics). Pathos of new management style is how to awaken motion
and to give impetus to evolution by small resonance effects and relevant internal organization of the system.
In this context, there is a failure of coercive control model based on a strict hierarchy of subject-object
relationship in favor of a model where subject and object of management are bound with the relationship of
assistance.
|
ru_RU |
| dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
Modern Management |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
Crisis of modernity |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
Freedom of subjectivity |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
Instrumental rationality |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
Post-nonclassical management model |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
Self-organization |
ru_RU |
| dc.subject |
Structure-attractors. |
ru_RU |
| dc.title |
Evolution of Management: From Classics of Modernity to Post-Nonclassical Paradigm |
ru_RU |
| dc.type |
Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
ru_RU |
|
EN 
中文 
ES 
Карта сайта
