Форма представления | Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
Год публикации | 2014 |
|
Каримов Артур Равилевич, автор
|
Другие авторы |
Казакова В.А. |
Библиографическое описание на языке оригинала |
Karimov, A.R., Kazakova V.A. Semantic and metasemantic notions of analyticity. Asian Social Science. Vol.10, No. 22, 2014. Pages 285-290. |
Аннотация |
In this article the evolution of main conceptions of analyticity is analyzed. Kant?s criteria for analytic/synthetic
distinction are discussed. Frege and Carnap notions of analyticity are set out. It is shown that Frege and Carnap
shifted the criteria of analyticity to the justificatory status of judgments. The notion of truth in virtue of meaning
and its criticism is exposed. Critical arguments against analyticity by W. V. O. Quine are discussed. Williamson?s
arguments against traditional notions of analyticity are formulated. Williamson maintains that analytic truths are
reduced to truths of other base classes-necessary, semantic or logical. It is shown that the stipulative definition of
analyticity is vulnerable to Williamson?s argument. Russell?s conception of truth in virtue of reference
determiner is exposed and evaluated. It is defended that the notion of truth in virtue of reference determiner is
immune to many standard objections against analyticity. |
Ключевые слова |
analyticity, meaning, stipulation, reference |
Название журнала |
Asian Social Science
|
URL |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n22p285 |
Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на эту карточку |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=89837 |
Файлы ресурса | |
|
Полная запись метаданных |
Поле DC |
Значение |
Язык |
dc.contributor.author |
Каримов Артур Равилевич |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2014 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Karimov, A.R., Kazakova V.A. Semantic and metasemantic notions of analyticity. Asian Social Science. Vol.10, No. 22, 2014. Pages 285-290. |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/?p_id=89837 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
Asian Social Science |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
In this article the evolution of main conceptions of analyticity is analyzed. Kant?s criteria for analytic/synthetic
distinction are discussed. Frege and Carnap notions of analyticity are set out. It is shown that Frege and Carnap
shifted the criteria of analyticity to the justificatory status of judgments. The notion of truth in virtue of meaning
and its criticism is exposed. Critical arguments against analyticity by W. V. O. Quine are discussed. Williamson?s
arguments against traditional notions of analyticity are formulated. Williamson maintains that analytic truths are
reduced to truths of other base classes-necessary, semantic or logical. It is shown that the stipulative definition of
analyticity is vulnerable to Williamson?s argument. Russell?s conception of truth in virtue of reference
determiner is exposed and evaluated. It is defended that the notion of truth in virtue of reference determiner is
immune to many standard objections against analyticity. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
analyticity |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
meaning |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
stipulation |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
reference |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
Semantic and metasemantic notions of analyticity |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Статьи в зарубежных журналах и сборниках |
ru_RU |
|