Form of presentation | Articles in Russian journals and collections |
Year of publication | 2016 |
|
Tereshhenko Natalya Anatolevna, author
|
Bibliographic description in the original language |
Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict Volume 20, Special Issue2, 2016
82
HISTORY AS A FRAME OF A DIALOGUE WITHIN
THE LOGIC OF POSTMODERNITY
Natalia A. Tereschenko, Kazan Federal University
Samson A. Liberman, Kazan Federal University |
Annotation |
This work is devoted to historical consideration of postmodern, or consideration of
postmodern as the specifically historical phenomena. Claiming that the postmodern can be
considered as a specific historical phenomenon, we state: a) certain uniqueness of this
phenomenon, existence of special "logic" of postmodern; b) some limitation, situation nature of
this logic, and, possibility of a certain bigger historical context. At the same time we also can't
do without mentioning special "situation of postmodern".
As an example of special postmodern logic (thesis "a") it is possible to name the thought
form described by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari in work "Capitalism and schizophrenia",
most accurately formulated in introduction to the second volume which is called "Rhizome" [10].
Also the logic named by Vladimir Bibler in "Dialogique" [8] and Anatoly Akhutin "Archeologics"
[6][7] will be an example. |
Keywords |
Historicism, the historical subject, the postmodern situation, the principle of
action, rhizome, dialogics. |
The name of the journal |
Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict
|
Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=150569&p_lang=2 |
Full metadata record |
Field DC |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Tereshhenko Natalya Anatolevna |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict Volume 20, Special Issue2, 2016
82
HISTORY AS A FRAME OF A DIALOGUE WITHIN
THE LOGIC OF POSTMODERNITY
Natalia A. Tereschenko, Kazan Federal University
Samson A. Liberman, Kazan Federal University |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=150569&p_lang=2 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
This work is devoted to historical consideration of postmodern, or consideration of
postmodern as the specifically historical phenomena. Claiming that the postmodern can be
considered as a specific historical phenomenon, we state: a) certain uniqueness of this
phenomenon, existence of special "logic" of postmodern; b) some limitation, situation nature of
this logic, and, possibility of a certain bigger historical context. At the same time we also can't
do without mentioning special "situation of postmodern".
As an example of special postmodern logic (thesis "a") it is possible to name the thought
form described by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari in work "Capitalism and schizophrenia",
most accurately formulated in introduction to the second volume which is called "Rhizome" [10].
Also the logic named by Vladimir Bibler in "Dialogique" [8] and Anatoly Akhutin "Archeologics"
[6][7] will be an example. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Historicism |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
the historical subject |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
the postmodern situation |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
the principle of
action |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
rhizome |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
dialogics. |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
HISTORY AS A FRAME OF A DIALOGUE WITHIN
THE LOGIC OF POSTMODERNITY
|
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Articles in Russian journals and collections |
ru_RU |
|