Form of presentation | Articles in international journals and collections |
Year of publication | 2017 |
Язык | русский |
|
Arslanov Kamil Maratovich, author
Khabirov Artur Ilfarovich, author
|
Bibliographic description in the original language |
Arslanov Kamil Maratovich, Khabirov Artur Ilfarovich. About the Weak Party of the Loan Contract // Astra Salvensis, Review of History and Culture Supplement. - 2017. - P.323-330. |
Annotation |
In work the question about which parties of the loan agreement it is
necessary to recognise weak is considered Л conclusion is drawn that not only the borrower is
weakness, but also the lessorin the presence of certain circumstances can be recognised by
nmkness.lt is established that in a design o f the loan agreement the so-called «floating' model
of weakness when depending on certain conditions Iry weakness it is necessary to recognise
either the borrower or the lessor is used. On the basis o f the analysis o f the doctrine and
jurisprudence authors prove a possibility of the use of the term «weakness”. further the
question what of the parties in the obligation - the debtor or the creditor is investigated - it is
necessary to recognise weak. Various approaches to the considered perspective are given.
/According to traditional approach by weakness of the loan agreement recognise the borrower.
However on the basis of the analysis of the current; legislation, opinions expressed in
educational and scientific literature and jurisprudence authors find it possible to recognise as
weakness of the loan agreement and the lessor. Statistical data, and also bills submitted for
consideration of the State Duma of the Russian federation are provided in confirmation of
this conclusion. On the basis o f the conducted research it is proved that the legislator recognises
as weakness of the loan agreement by the general rule of the borrower, and in case of nonexecution
by the borrower of the obligation for return oj a subject of a loan weakness the lessor
admits. |
Keywords |
loan agreement, weakness, lessor, borrower, bilaterally binding character, rights of the borrower |
The name of the journal |
Astra Salvensis, Review of History and Culture Supplement
|
Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=173288&p_lang=2 |
Resource files | |
|
Full metadata record |
Field DC |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Arslanov Kamil Maratovich |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Khabirov Artur Ilfarovich |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Arslanov Kamil Maratovich, Khabirov Artur Ilfarovich. About the Weak Party of the Loan Contract // Astra Salvensis, Review of History and Culture Supplement. - 2017. - P.323-330. |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=173288&p_lang=2 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
Astra Salvensis, Review of History and Culture Supplement |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
In work the question about which parties of the loan agreement it is
necessary to recognise weak is considered Л conclusion is drawn that not only the borrower is
weakness, but also the lessorin the presence of certain circumstances can be recognised by
nmkness.lt is established that in a design o f the loan agreement the so-called «floating' model
of weakness when depending on certain conditions Iry weakness it is necessary to recognise
either the borrower or the lessor is used. On the basis o f the analysis o f the doctrine and
jurisprudence authors prove a possibility of the use of the term «weakness”. further the
question what of the parties in the obligation - the debtor or the creditor is investigated - it is
necessary to recognise weak. Various approaches to the considered perspective are given.
/According to traditional approach by weakness of the loan agreement recognise the borrower.
However on the basis of the analysis of the current; legislation, opinions expressed in
educational and scientific literature and jurisprudence authors find it possible to recognise as
weakness of the loan agreement and the lessor. Statistical data, and also bills submitted for
consideration of the State Duma of the Russian federation are provided in confirmation of
this conclusion. On the basis o f the conducted research it is proved that the legislator recognises
as weakness of the loan agreement by the general rule of the borrower, and in case of nonexecution
by the borrower of the obligation for return oj a subject of a loan weakness the lessor
admits. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
loan agreement |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
weakness |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
lessor |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
borrower |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
bilaterally binding character |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
rights of the borrower |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
About the Weak Party of the Loan Contract |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Articles in international journals and collections |
ru_RU |
|