KFU. Card publication. THE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY ART DEMANDS AND ACADEMIC TRADITIONS OF ART EDUCATION

KAZAN
FEDERAL UNIVERSITY

- RUS
- 中文
- ES

THE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY ART DEMANDS AND ACADEMIC TRADITIONS OF ART EDUCATION

Form of presentation

Articles in Russian journals and collections

Year of publication

2019

��

��

Authors, employees of KFU

Emanova Yuliana Gennadevna, author

Mukhametzyanova Liliya Rinatovna, author

Yao Mikhail Konstantinovich, author

Other authors

Pushkar Taisiya , author

Bibliographic description in the original language

Muhametzanova L., Pushkar T.,Emanova J. , Yao M. THE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY ART DEMANDS AND ACADEMIC TRADITIONS OF ART EDUCATION//Herald NAMSCA. - 2018.- �3(2). R. 5-7.

Annotation

To date, one can observe a discrepancy between the academic traditions of the training of artists and the nature of development of contemporary art. The paradox consists in the fact that the main centers of art education, inculcating professional skills, do not create the conditions for the formation of a creative personality, who would be able to present fundamentally new concepts in art. In order to determine whether there is a link between the system of art education and the degree of recognition of the artist by the expert community, a content analysis of the foreign reference books on art has been conducted. The problem of assessing their significance as cultural values is reflected in the principles of the selection of authors and their works. Content analysis reveals that the most frequently mentioned are the works by ancient Russian masters, Theophanes Grek, Andrei Rublev; masters of realism I. Repin, V. Serov; the names of modernist artists – V. Kandinsky, K. Malevich, V. Tatlin, M. Larionov, N. Goncharova, E. Lisitsky, A. Rodchenko; artists who developed their personal style in Russia, and biography in other countries - A. Yavlensky, M. Verevkina, Ch. Soutine, M. Chagall, N. Gabo, A. Pevsner, A. Arkhipenko. After acquainting with their biographies, the authors found out that only two of them were constructivists — V. Tatlin and E. Lissitzky had an art school completed, but not an academic one. Moreover, all the most famous modernists were expelled or dropped out of art schools. From their own memories, they were formed and supported by the artistic environment of modernism. The problem consists in the imbalance between those who are being in demand in the visual arts of today and those who are being trained by the modern Russian system of art education. A number of divergences characterize the system of relations between contemporary art and the traditional system of art education – between the expectations of the students and the system of education, teachers' understanding of their tasks and the requirements of the expert community, criteria of estimation of a student and an artist. According to the authors, the function of school is not to answer the questions but to teach the future artist to put them both to himself and his audience

Keywords

contemporary art, art education, academic traditions, creative method, modernism, reference books on art, artistic individuality.

The name of the journal

Herald NAMSCA

URL

http://jrhnamsca.icu/index.php/hnamsca/article/view/129/129

Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card

https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=203829&p_lang=2

Full metadata record

Field DC	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Emanova Yuliana Gennadevna	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Mukhametzyanova Liliya Rinatovna	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Yao Mikhail Konstantinovich	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Pushkar Taisiya	ru_RU
dc.date.accessioned	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.available	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.issued	2019	ru_RU
dc.identifier.citation	Muhametzanova L., Pushkar T.,Emanova J. , Yao M. THE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY ART DEMANDS AND ACADEMIC TRADITIONS OF ART EDUCATION//Herald NAMSCA. - 2018.- �3(2). �. 5-7.	ru_RU
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=203829&p_lang=2	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	Herald NAMSCA	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	To date, one can observe a discrepancy between the academic traditions of the training of artists and the nature of development of contemporary art. The paradox consists in the fact that the main centers of art education, inculcating professional skills, do not create the conditions for the formation of a creative personality, who would be able to present fundamentally new concepts in art. In order to determine whether there is a link between the system of art education and the degree of recognition of the artist by the expert community, a content analysis of the foreign reference books on art has been conducted. The problem of assessing their significance as cultural values is reflected in the principles of the selection of authors and their works. Content analysis reveals that the most frequently mentioned are the works by ancient Russian masters, Theophanes Grek, Andrei Rublev; masters of realism I. Repin, V. Serov; the names of modernist artists – V. Kandinsky, K. Malevich, V. Tatlin, M. Larionov, N. Goncharova, E. Lisitsky, A. Rodchenko; artists who developed their personal style in Russia, and biography in other countries - A. Yavlensky, M. Verevkina, Ch. Soutine, M. Chagall, N. Gabo, A. Pevsner, A. Arkhipenko. After acquainting with their biographies, the authors found out that only two of them were constructivists — V. Tatlin and E. Lissitzky had an art school completed, but not an academic one. Moreover, all the most famous modernists were expelled or dropped out of art schools. From their own memories, they were formed and supported by the artistic environment of modernism. The problem consists in the imbalance between those who are being in demand in the visual arts of today and those who are being trained by the modern Russian system of art education. A number of divergences characterize the system of relations between contemporary art and the traditional system of art education – between the expectations of the students and the system of education, teachers' understanding of their tasks and the requirements of the expert community, criteria of estimation of a student and an artist. According to the authors, the function of school is not to answer the questions but to teach the future artist to put them both to himself and his audience	ru_RU
dc.language.iso	ru	ru_RU
dc.subject	contemporary art	ru_RU
dc.subject	art education	ru_RU
dc.subject	academic traditions	ru_RU
dc.subject	creative method	ru_RU
dc.subject	modernism	ru_RU
dc.subject	reference books on art	ru_RU
dc.subject	artistic individuality.	ru_RU
dc.title	THE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY ART DEMANDS AND ACADEMIC TRADITIONS OF ART EDUCATION	ru_RU
dc.type	Articles in Russian journals and collections	ru_RU