KFU. Card publication. Environmental crimes: Law enforcement issues

KAZAN
FEDERAL UNIVERSITY

- RUS
- 中文
- ES

ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES: LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUES

Form of presentation

Articles in international journals and collections

Year of publication

2020

Язык

английский

Authors, employees of KFU

Golubev Stanislav Igorevich, author

Other authors

Gracheva, Malikov, Chuchaev Yuliya, Sergey, Aleksandr , author

Bibliographic description in the original language

Stanislav Igorevich Golubev, Julia Viktorovna Gracheva, Sergey Vladimirovich Malikov, Alexander Ivanovich Chuchaev/ Environmental crimes: Law enforcement issues// Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences Volume 18, Issue 5 December 2020 Pages 533-540

Annotation

An analysis of the statistics of registered environmental crimes indicates a clear disproportion between the real state of affairs in ecology and counteraction to such crimes. One of the reasons for this imbalance may be the difficulty in qualifying and proving the crimes in question. When applying the norms on environmental crimes, it should be borne in mind that the overwhelming majority of them are blanket. Along with the massiveness of environmental legislation, there are also actually criminal law issues that give rise to practical problems. These include determination of the form of guilt, the use of evaluative concepts, the need for qualifications in combination with other crimes, the establishment of a causal relationship. The most important are the following steps in the field of combating environmental crime: 1) when determining the form of guilt, along with the content of the act, the methods of its commission and other signs of the objective side, consider the sanction for their commission; 2) the spread of the practice of establishing specific rates for calculating the amount of damage instead of evaluative concepts to unify judicial practice and bring it to uniformity; 3) improvement of calculation methods and practice of compensation for damage resulting from environmental offenses; and 4) minimization of the practice of constructing truncated corpus delicti or concretizing the concept of «threat« in such structures.

Keywords

Environmental crime, Threats, Criminal liability, Qualification Arbitrage practice, Moment of completion Guilt, Statistics, Prevention

The name of the journal

Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences

URL

https://cjes.guilan.ac.ir/article_4483.html

Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card

https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=253016&p_lang=2

Full metadata record

Field DC	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Golubev Stanislav Igorevich	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Gracheva, Malikov, Chuchaev Yuliya, Sergey, Aleksandr	ru_RU
dc.date.accessioned	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.available	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.issued	2020	ru_RU
dc.identifier.citation	Stanislav Igorevich Golubev, Julia Viktorovna Gracheva, Sergey Vladimirovich Malikov, Alexander Ivanovich Chuchaev/ Environmental crimes: Law enforcement issues// Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences Volume 18, Issue 5 December 2020 Pages 533-540	ru_RU
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=253016&p_lang=2	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	An analysis of the statistics of registered environmental crimes indicates a clear disproportion between the real state of affairs in ecology and counteraction to such crimes. One of the reasons for this imbalance may be the difficulty in qualifying and proving the crimes in question. When applying the norms on environmental crimes, it should be borne in mind that the overwhelming majority of them are blanket. Along with the massiveness of environmental legislation, there are also actually criminal law issues that give rise to practical problems. These include determination of the form of guilt, the use of evaluative concepts, the need for qualifications in combination with other crimes, the establishment of a causal relationship. The most important are the following steps in the field of combating environmental crime: 1) when determining the form of guilt, along with the content of the act, the methods of its commission and other signs of the objective side, consider the sanction for their commission; 2) the spread of the practice of establishing specific rates for calculating the amount of damage instead of evaluative concepts to unify judicial practice and bring it to uniformity; 3) improvement of calculation methods and practice of compensation for damage resulting from environmental offenses; and 4) minimization of the practice of constructing truncated corpus delicti or concretizing the concept of «threat« in such structures.	ru_RU
dc.language.iso	ru	ru_RU
dc.subject	Environmental crime	ru_RU
dc.subject	Threats	ru_RU
dc.subject	Criminal liability	ru_RU
dc.subject	Qualification Arbitrage practice	ru_RU
dc.subject	Moment of completion Guilt	ru_RU
dc.subject	Statistics	ru_RU
dc.subject	Prevention	ru_RU
dc.title	Environmental crimes: Law enforcement issues	ru_RU
dc.type	Articles in international journals and collections	ru_RU