KFU. Card publication. INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE PAST AND TOURISM IN THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE MEMORY OF THE VOLGA BULGARIA PERIOD)

- RUS
- 中文
- ES

INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE PAST AND TOURISM IN THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE MEMORY OF THE VOLGA BULGARIA PERIOD)

Form of presentation

Articles in international journals and collections

Year of publication

2024

��

��

Authors, employees of KFU

Garina Karina Adgamovna, author

Eflova Mariya Yurevna, author

Maksimova Olga Aleksandrovna, author

Bibliographic description in the original language

Eflova M, Garina K, Maximova O, INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE PAST AND TOURISM IN THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE MEMORY OF THE VOLGA BULGARIA PERIOD)//REVISTA GESTAO & TECNOLOGIA-JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY. - 2024. - Vol.24, Is.2. - P.270-278.

Annotation

The text presents the results of the study of the relationship between memory politics and institutionalization of reference to the past on the example of the memory of the medieval state of Volga Bulgaria in the Republic of Tatarstan. Memory politics is defined from the position of constructivism as the creation by the state (or other social actors) of certain frames of perception and representations of the past. Memory politics is consolidated through the process of institutionalization (expressed both in the work with physical places of memory and in the creation of formal and informal institutional structures engaged in the construction of the past). Key elements of memory politics are institutionally reproduced: narratives, actors (e.g., through the training of representatives of a certain school of historical research, licensing of tour guides), channels of memory politics (museums, conferences, texts, etc.). Institutional anchoring sets the framework for interpreting both the image of the region and the image of the Tatar ethnic group on the basis of reference to the Bulgarian past. Thus, the construction of infrastructure (in a broad sense, both subject and organizational) presenting opportunities for the representation of a wide audience of the Bulgarian period, becomes another significant strategy of the policy of memory of the Volga Bulgaria in Tatarstan.

Keywords

ethnicity, institutionalization, tourism, regional tourism, politics of memory, social memory, places of memory

The name of the journal

REVISTA GESTAO & TECNOLOGIA-JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY

URL

https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001214286800005

Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card

https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=300468&p_lang=2

Full metadata record

Field DC	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Garina Karina Adgamovna	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Eflova Mariya Yurevna	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Maksimova Olga Aleksandrovna	ru_RU
dc.date.accessioned	2024-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.available	2024-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.issued	2024	ru_RU
dc.identifier.citation	Eflova M, Garina K, Maximova O, INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE PAST AND TOURISM IN THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE MEMORY OF THE VOLGA BULGARIA PERIOD)//REVISTA GESTAO & TECNOLOGIA-JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY. - 2024. - Vol.24, Is.2. - P.270-278.	ru_RU
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=300468&p_lang=2	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	REVISTA GESTAO & TECNOLOGIA-JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	The text presents the results of the study of the relationship between memory politics and institutionalization of reference to the past on the example of the memory of the medieval state of Volga Bulgaria in the Republic of Tatarstan. Memory politics is defined from the position of constructivism as the creation by the state (or other social actors) of certain frames of perception and representations of the past. Memory politics is consolidated through the process of institutionalization (expressed both in the work with physical places of memory and in the creation of formal and informal institutional structures engaged in the construction of the past). Key elements of memory politics are institutionally reproduced: narratives, actors (e.g., through the training of representatives of a certain school of historical research, licensing of tour guides), channels of memory politics (museums, conferences, texts, etc.). Institutional anchoring sets the framework for interpreting both the image of the region and the image of the Tatar ethnic group on the basis of reference to the Bulgarian past. Thus, the construction of infrastructure (in a broad sense, both subject and organizational) presenting opportunities for the representation of a wide audience of the Bulgarian period, becomes another significant strategy of the policy of memory of the Volga Bulgaria in Tatarstan.	ru_RU
dc.language.iso	ru	ru_RU
dc.subject	ethnicity	ru_RU
dc.subject	institutionalization	ru_RU
dc.subject	tourism	ru_RU
dc.subject	regional tourism	ru_RU
dc.subject	politics of memory	ru_RU
dc.subject	social memory	ru_RU
dc.subject	places of memory	ru_RU
dc.title	INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE PAST AND TOURISM IN THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE MEMORY OF THE VOLGA BULGARIA PERIOD)	ru_RU
dc.type	Articles in international journals and collections	ru_RU